Posts

The use of plastic packaging is highly demonised within the press and, although there is more to be done in reducing the use of unnecessary plastic packaging, is there still a place for it today? Food waste is not only an environmental but a humanitarian crisis. Around 1/3 of food produced globally is wasted yet more than 800 million people are considered to be starving. Although plastics remains a serious issue contributor to the global environmental crisis, food waste actually contributes more to climate change than plastics.

1.3 billion tons of food is wasted every year around the world”

Plastic Euroe

According to Plastics Europe, “around 1.3 billion tons of food is wasted every year around the world”. Despite some issues, plastics can provide an ideal solution to this ever-increasing issue. By keeping perishable foodstuffs, such as fruits and vegetables, in plastic packaging, it can be delivered with the highest quality guaranteed and maximum shelf-life possible. This helps to reduce both global food wastage and energy consumption whilst vicariously increasing sustainability. Plastics Europe also goes one step further, announcing “the first commercial manufacturing plant that captures C02 emissions…is now operational”. The ability to become carbon-neutral within the packaging industry is a gamechanger for sustainability. Plastic retains its value beyond the end of its current lifecycle as it has the capacity to be recreated time and time again. This recovery of energy saves on fossil fuels and further prevents mass wastage. New technology with the ability to breakdown “non-recyclable” polymers becoming more accessible, virgin polymer production (which requires oil or gas for energy) can begin to retire and therefore become more sustainable: recycling the unrecyclable.

Food waste feeds climate change. Up to 40% of all food produced ends up wasted. This equates to around 8–10% of all greenhouse gas emissions. According to WRAP, “in the UK, 70% of post-farm gate food waste comes from the home”. Plastic packaging increases the shelf-life of perishable products. By extending this edible period, food is much less likely to be wasted. For example, the shelf-life of beef can be extended by 5-10 days with the use of advanced plastic packaging, remaining fresher for longer so food wastage is decreased. Europe on average loses around 3% of all food produced compared to up to 40% in developing countries. If plastic packaging can be more widely accessible to a global population, food wastage can be significantly decreased, and suppliers can maintain quality and freshness. This decreases waste at every part of the chain, from picking to packing to eating. WRAP has released recommendations to improve this food wastage as well as try and save on excess plastic packaging. These recommendations include selling loose, removing date labels and provide ‘Best Practice’ guidance on storage.  If industry was to implement WRAP’s three recommendations, they estimate around 14,000,000 shopping baskets worth of food waste could be avoided along with around 1,110 truckloads of plastic.

In a post-pandemic world, many of us are still deeply uncomfortable with loose produce. Plastic packaging protects against contamination of food by creating a barrier between us and the produce. This not only extends shelf life but saves on water wastage as washing is not required. Plastic containers for more delicate products such as berries provide not only a sanitary purpose but also prevents physical damage in transport. This in turn reduces waste as more produce makes it to our supermarkets rather than be disposed of before they even hit the shelves.

Just 1kg of food going to landfill produces the same emissions as 25,000 plastic bottles (500ml)

When it comes to an overuse single use plastics, it can be agreed that it has a negative impact on the environment and steps have been taken to reduce this. Food waste, however, is the hidden climate crisis that seldom hits the headlines like plastic waste. Just 1kg of food going to landfill produces the same emissions as 25,000 plastic bottles (500ml). We still have more to do in reducing our environmental impact and plastics can surprisingly aid that. By using plastics to elongate the shelf-life of perishable goods we can reduce global food wastage and the greenhouse gas emissions they produce. This greatly reduces the negative impact we upon the environment and helps to prevent further climate change.

It doesn’t take long whilst scrolling through LinkedIn or browsing packaging media outlet news feed that you’ll come across a post or an opinion that would suggest that one form of packaging is “better” than the other. Especially when it comes to the debate of paper “vs” plastic and recyclability “vs” carbon emissions.

The comments section is filled with “no it isn’t”, and “”but you’re only consider one thing”, or “there is no one single solution” and I agree with them all.

We must always go back to why we have packaging, it is to PROTECT & PRESERVE

  • To protect: There wouldn’t be any hunger in the world if there were no food losses. More food is produced than we really eat or utilise. While packaging is powerless to stop waste, it is able to stop spoiling. Although shelf life is constrained, it can be extended. The shelf life of unpackaged beef is four days. Meat that has been vacuum-packed has a shelf life of around 30 days. Increased product shelf life helps prevent food waste and postpone deterioration.
  • For growth: The flow of commodities increases as a result of urbanisation, expansion, and globalisation, posing new infrastructural issues. Significantly less transport capacity are required throughout the life cycle as a result of the low weight and space savings. Less traffic, less strain on the infrastructure, and less environmental pollution are all benefits of having more merchandise on the trucks. It is feasible to save weight and space during shipment by using thinner films. As a result, the amount of cargo during transportation rises dramatically, and loading zones may be utilised to their full potential. Thus, the life cycle evaluation is enhanced (LCA). Flexible packaging is efficient and economical. Products are more reasonably priced for those with modest incomes when they are packaged in small, economical amounts.

In a technical sense, it is possible to recycle all plastic, and the technology is available. However, in order to sift, recycle, and sell them as raw materials for new products, they must first be gathered. All of this must be accomplished economically. The development of new recycling methods that enable the industrial-scale recycling of even more forms of plastic may take a few years. However, in the interim, the plastics sector is collaborating with the government to achieve the shared objective of streamlining the materials that are gathered for recycling across the UK to make life simpler for individuals.

What we see in the interim is a race for alternatives to plastic as it is somewhat seen as the enemy! Yet time and time again publication and research back the opinion that alternative have a negative impact vs plastics.

The plastics investigated in a recent research by KcKinsey & Company offer lower overall GHG contribution compared with alternatives in 13 of 14 applications for which nonplastic alternatives are deployed at scale. Taking into account both the impact of consumption and the product life cycle, GHG reductions range from 10 to 90%. Additionally, there aren’t many alternatives to plastics today in many applications, particularly those that are centred in food packaging. Given their smaller GHG footprint, plastics use in the near term can actually aid decarbonization efforts in these sectors, notably in terms of food spoilage and energy efficiency.

It all depends on the application

The degree to which sustainability factors are given priority affects the sustainability of packaging materials. Businesses in the value chain will need to be aware of the trade-offs between reducing waste and carbon footprint.

So what is the criteria that should be considered:

  1. Minise the harm that non recyclable packaging will have on the environment
  2. Assess the GHG emission
  3. Recyclability and recycled content

Recycling is effective. Recently the British Plastic Federation concluded in response to the Big Plastic Count that between 30 and 80 percent of the carbon emissions produced during the manufacture and processing of virgin plastic are avoided through recycling. The quantity of plastic recycled has grown 2.4 times since 2006, with the UK recycling 51 percent of plastic packaging in 2020. For the first time ever, the UK recycled more plastic within its borders than it did for recycling abroad last year. Although there is still work to be done, it is apparent that progress has been made.

At Skymark we want to enable & inspire every individual and organisation to do more, using less. With our passion & desire to listen and give a personalised, collaborative experience, developing Innovative, forward thinking packaging solutions

Dan Richards – Sales & Marketing Director

We take another big step toward our SME Climate Commitment to half our CO2 emissions by 2030 and to be net-zero by 2050. As part of our SKYGREEN agenda, we’re pleased to announce that our Scunthorpe facility is now 100% powered by renewable electricity backed by REGOs

What are REGOs?

Renewable Energy Guarantees of Origin (REGOs), are certificates which show that electricity has been generated from renewable sources. Energy generators are given one REGO for each megawatt hour of electricity they produce. All of this is administered by Ofgem (the Energy Industry Regulator).

Renewable energy is energy that comes from sustainable sources. This means that they won’t run out, unlike other energy sources such as coal. Some examples of renewable energy out there include solar power, wind power and hydro-energy.

Why use renewable energy?

Because we only have a limited amount of resources, such as fossil fuels, whereas renewable energy is potentially unlimited. Renewable energy sources also cause less damage to the environment, as well as reduce carbon emissions and the effects of global warming.

It is our top priority to continue to move towards a sustainable future, not only in the materials we manufacture but the way in which we make them. Switching to 100% renewable energy is another contribution to our REDUCE headline under our SKYGREEN agenda.

Dan Richards – Sales & Marketing Director

As part of our continuing drive to provide environmentally friendly packaging solutions to our valued clients, Skymark Packaging International Ltd. are pleased to announce we have successfully undertaken an audit for the FSC®  Chain of Custody system.

 The FSC®  Chain of Custody system is designed to ensure that any paper-based products carrying the logo is grown, logged and processed in line with ethical, safety and legal compliance, meaning customers can rest assured that the product they purchase is part of a rigorous supply chain assessment that has the environment, as well as worker’s well being at the heart of everything.

 As part of our expanding offering of environmentally friendly and ethically sourced packaging material solutions, FSC®  offered the perfect fit to further strengthen our commitment to the environment and all our stakeholders.

 Each partner in the supply of FSC®  labelled product must be certified for any FSC®  claims to be made by any party.

 This significant milestone allows our clients to explore alternative packaging formats, safe in the knowledge that their entire supply chain meets the requirements for sustainable forestry and integrity of products.

 As a result of this positive Audit assessment, we are now able to provide both our traditional Flexible plastic packaging solutions, as well paper-based packaging formats to a growing audience of environmentally conscious end-users.

 Sitting alongside our recycle-ready SKYMONO PE laminate offerings, as well as our well-established plastic packaging offerings containing minimum 30% recycled content materials, our new printed SKYPAPR offerings offer the opportunity for consumers to easily recycle materials from the comfort of their home, causing minimal disruptions all the while providing the peace of mind that the material choices they make ensure the best possible option for sustainability.