The UK government is pushing ahead with its Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) plans, despite opposition from some industry groups. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has recently issued a reminder about reporting requirements for EPR, which have come into force. EPR means that most existing obligated businesses, including many in the packaging industry, must collect data for the revamped packaging producer responsibility system, and pay for the cost of waste collections.

EPR will make firms that supply household packaging more responsible for the costs of dealing with packaging waste, moving costs away councils and council taxpayers. This system will encourage businesses to increase their use of recyclable materials, shifting costs away from the taxpayer and supporting efforts to protect the environment from waste. The data gathered this year will provide the basis for establishing the packaging waste management fees individual producers will pay in 2024 when the new packaging EPR system comes into force.

Despite opposition from some industry groups, such as the British Retail Consortium (BRC), Defra remains committed to working with producers on waste and recycling reforms. The BRC represents the largest UK retailers and has called on the Prime Minister to intervene on both EPR and the deposit return scheme (DRS), claiming that the two schemes combined will add around £4 billion in costs to retailers, which will be passed down the line. Defra has already reduced costs of its business waste proposals from £2.7 billion to £1.4 billion, following industry feedback.

Defra has insisted that EPR is still on track to be delivered from 2024, but it will remain in talks with producers as the final design of the scheme and delivery plans are developed. The department has listened to feedback from industry and removed its business waste proposals, reducing costs from £2.7 billion to £1.4 billion. The plans for EPR, which will come into force from 2024, play a key part in delivering the government’s goals of preserving the stock of material resources by minimizing waste, promoting resource efficiency, and moving towards a more circular economy.

Deep Sagar, Chair of the Advisory Committee on Packaging, said that packaging materials that are not recycled back into new packaging harm our natural environment. Councils have to spend more managing that waste, and the public cannot enjoy spaces such as parks and high streets as they should. EPR will reduce that waste. It will make goods producers pay for collection of all packaging waste, encouraging them to reduce or recycle more packaging. EPR could be a game-changer, reducing the impact packaging has on the environment by regulating material use and increasing recycling.

It must serve all – producers, local and central government, recyclers, and the public. The introduction of an EPR for packaging could be a game-changer. If done effectively, it could reduce the impact packaging has on the environment by regulating material use and increasing recycling.

Claire Shrewsbury, Director of Insights and Innovation at the Waste and Resources Action Programme

Defra has highlighted that the plans featured in the 2018 Resources and Waste Strategy, which set out how the government will preserve our stock of material resources by minimizing waste, promoting resource efficiency, and moving towards a more circular economy. In the plan, the government committed to several actions, including the introduction of an EPR scheme for packaging. The revenue generated will support better local council services and ensure that households can all recycle the same packaging materials.

Defra has said that the EPR system will help stop packaging waste being burnt and encourage businesses to use more recyclable materials, shifting costs away from the taxpayer and supporting efforts to protect the environment from the scourge of waste. This is part of wider waste reforms introduced by the government, including bans on more single-use plastic items, a deposit return scheme for drinks containers, and consistent recycling collections for households and businesses, on top of targets for recycling packaging waste.

However, industry lobbying has been growing in recent weeks as the 2024 EPR deadline nears, and fears over Scotland’s DRS also rise. Many have expressed frustrations during Defra’s visionary sprint groups over the lack of detail in the short-term. Producers in Scotland have also been publicly calling for the DRS to be delayed, and the Scottish government has softened large parts of the regulations. Reports over the weekend suggested that small producers could be exempt completely in the early years of the scheme.

The BRC’s letter to the Prime Minister marks the latest attempt from some producer groups to pressure the government over parts of the proposals amid the cost of living crisis. In August 2022, the department denied suggestions from the Food and Drink Federation that the plans would add £60 to shopping bills. The FDF, whose members include large producers such as Coca-Cola and Unilever, called on ministers to pause the plans, which would be an “easy win” for consumers already facing higher costs.

Defra has confirmed that obligated packaging producers in England, Northern Ireland, and Scotland must collect information on the amount and type of packaging they have supplied during 2023. Wales will follow shortly. Producers with a turnover of greater than £2 million and who handle more than 50 tonnes of packaging each year must also report this information to the Environment Agency twice a year. The first reports must be submitted from 1 October 2023.

In conclusion, the UK government’s EPR plans have been met with opposition from some industry groups, but Defra has remained committed to working with producers on waste and recycling reforms. The EPR system aims to encourage businesses to use more recyclable materials and reduce the costs of waste management for councils and taxpayers. The data gathered this year will provide the basis for establishing the packaging waste management fees individual producers will pay in 2024 when the new packaging EPR system comes into force. While there are concerns from some industry groups about the costs of EPR, the government believes that it will help to preserve the stock of material resources, minimize waste, promote resource efficiency, and move towards a more circular economy.

Skymark’s Study on Plastic Packaging CO2e and Benefits for Businesses and Environment

Reducing your carbon footprint has become an increasingly important issue in recent years, as the negative impacts of climate change have become more apparent. As individuals, we can take steps to reduce our carbon footprint by changing our lifestyle and consumption habits, but it is also important for companies to take responsibility and make changes to reduce their carbon emissions. One way that companies can do this is by focusing on reducing the carbon footprint of their packaging, particularly plastic packaging, which has a significant impact on the environment.

In partnership with Benchmark Consulting, Skymark conducted research on the carbon footprint of its SKYMONO range of material vs the “standard” alternative. The study aims to provide data that can help companies make more informed choices when it comes to reducing their environmental impact. The company’s commitment to reducing its CO2 by half by 2030 and being net-zero by 2050 is part of the SME Climate Hub, a global initiative launched by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

The methodology used in the study involved updating all web systems with the CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) figure, with all material CO2e data sourced from EcoInvent using database 3.8 (2022) cut-off data. This uses the 100-year impact assessment, which is generally regarded as appropriate for packaging. The CO2e data for machines is based on a ‘high performance’ profile, assuming modern machines during the production process. The machine supporting assumptions can be made available upon request.

The unit of measure used to express CO2e impact is kg/kg. This is defined as the kilos of CO2e released into the atmosphere over a 100-year period per kilo of material used. All data for machines is based on real-life energy consumption in the market, with energy consumption converted to CO2e using IEA data, whereby an EU average was used. The Skymark specifications assume MOQ as 25,000m², with width 480mm, cut-off 190mm, and 8 colours printed Flexo.

skymono-bvp

The study found that Skymark’s SKYMONO BVP specifications are, on average, 15% less CO2e than the alternatives using BO-PE/PE.EVOH material. The yield improvement of the Skymark specifications is the key driver to the reduced CO2e. Interestingly, PP has a higher CO2e impact than PE, with 2.28 (CO2ekg/kg) versus 1.96 (CO2ekg/kg). Although the Skymark solutions use predominantly PP, whereas the alternatives use PE as a base in the sealing layer, the Skymark solution benefits from a lower g/m² and therefore an increased yield. In short, Skymark specifications are 4% lighter in weight than the alternative specifications.

Reducing the carbon footprint of plastic packaging can be achieved in a number of ways. For example, using recycled materials or reducing the amount of plastic used in packaging can significantly reduce the overall carbon footprint of the product. This can have a positive impact on the environment, but it can also benefit the brand by driving consumer interest.

Consumers are becoming increasingly aware of the impact that their choices have on the environment, and many are actively seeking out products that are environmentally friendly. By reducing the carbon footprint of their packaging, companies can appeal to this growing market and differentiate themselves from competitors. In addition to the environmental and consumer benefits, reducing the carbon footprint of packaging can also have financial benefits for companies. By using less plastic or recycled materials, companies can reduce their material costs, which can have a positive impact on their bottom line.

There are also regulatory and legislative drivers for reducing the carbon footprint of packaging. Governments around the world are introducing new regulations and targets to reduce the use of plastic and to increase the use of recycled materials. Companies that proactively make changes to reduce the carbon footprint of their packaging can position themselves as leaders in the industry and can avoid potential penalties or fines in the future.

Skymark’s research on the carbon footprint of its packaging materials is an excellent example of how companies can proactively identify areas for improvement and make changes that benefit both the environment and their bottom line. By being part of the SME Climate Hub, Skymark is demonstrating its commitment to taking action on climate change and being a leader in the industry.

The study conducted by Skymark has provided valuable data that can help companies make informed decisions when it comes to reducing their carbon footprint. The methodology used in the study provides transparency on the CO2e impact of different materials and machines used in the production of packaging. This information can help companies identify areas for improvement and make changes that reduce their carbon emissions.

As consumers become increasingly environmentally conscious, it is crucial for companies to take responsibility and make changes to reduce their carbon emissions and environmental impact. By reducing the carbon footprint of their packaging, companies can appeal to environmentally conscious consumers, differentiate themselves from competitors, and potentially reduce costs. In addition, there are regulatory and legislative drivers that make reducing the carbon footprint of packaging a smart business decision.

In conclusion, reducing your carbon footprint is important for both individuals and companies, and reducing the carbon footprint of plastic packaging is one way that companies can make a positive impact. Skymark’s research provides valuable data that can help companies make informed decisions when it comes to reducing their carbon emissions. By being part of the SME Climate Hub, Skymark is demonstrating its commitment to taking action on climate change and being a leader in the industry. Companies that take action to reduce their carbon footprint can benefit from environmental, consumer, and financial benefits, as well as positioning themselves as leaders in the industry.

Introducing SKYMONO BVP, the innovative new high-performance PP packaging solution designed for the FFS packaging sector. This polypropylene structure offers exceptional gas and aroma barrier properties that ensure the freshness and quality of perishable products, making it an ideal choice for modified atmosphere packaging applications.

SKYMONO BVP is a game-changer in the world of packaging, offering outstanding optical properties and compatibility with normal ink systems in reverse printing, making it an ideal choice for packaging that requires high-quality graphics and branding. The film’s water-based barrier coating, sets it apart from the competition, making it an environmentally friendly choice for companies looking to reduce their environmental impact.

SKYMONO BVP fully recyclable PP high barrier laminate

SKYMONO BVP provides improved barrier protection against mineral oils compared to non-barrier films. This makes it an ideal choice for packaging dry food products, such as snacks and cereals, as well as a wide range of other consumer goods. The film is also lap sealable to PP films for monomaterial proposals, reducing the need for additional materials in the packaging process.

In terms of sustainability, SKYMONO BVP’s claim of a reduction of 15% CO2e* compared to its PE alternatives is a significant factor in its position as a top-performing, sustainable, and recyclable product in the UK. CO2e, or carbon dioxide equivalent, is a measure of the total greenhouse gas emissions produced by a product or activity. By reducing its CO2e emissions by 15% compared to its PE alternatives and also its packaging weight, SKYMONO BVP is demonstrating its commitment to sustainability and reducing its environmental impact.

We’re especially proud to launch SKYMONO BVP as it utilises all of our assets as a vertically integrated packaging supplier, extruding our own CPP enabling us to engineer a high speed form, fill and seal product.

Dan Richards – Sales & Marketing Director

In addition, as a polypropylene film, SKYMONO BVP is fully recyclable, making it a more sustainable choice for companies looking to reduce their waste and environmental impact. This, combined with its exceptional gas and aroma barrier properties, outstanding optical properties, and compatibility with normal ink systems, makes it a top-performing, sustainable, and recyclable product in the UK packaging industry.

SKYMONO BVP is an innovative, high-performance packaging solution that provides the ultimate protection for dry products while also being environmentally responsible. Its exceptional gas and aroma barrier properties, outstanding optical properties, and compatibility with normal ink systems make it an ideal choice for companies looking to take their packaging to the next level. Its commitment to reducing its CO2e emissions, combined with its recyclable properties, places it at the forefront of sustainable and environmentally responsible products in the UK

*All CO2e calculations verified by Benchmark CO2e calculation model

At SKYMARK, we are dedicated to providing our customers with innovative packaging solutions that meet their needs and support their sustainability goals. That’s why we’re thrilled to announce the launch of our newest addition to our line of polyethylene-based structures: SKYMONO BVE.

This high-barrier option is an evolution of our SKYMONO range, SKYMONO BVE is the ideal choice for extending the shelf life of food products. And best of all, both versions are widely recyclable in Europe through existing streams and are OPRL compliant in the UK for front-of-store drop-off.

SKYMONO BVE recyclable high barrier PE

We believe that everyone should be able to do more while using less, and that’s why we’re passionate about providing forward-thinking packaging solutions. Our commitment to sustainability is evident in the launch of SKYMONO BVE, which offers an alternative to conventional multi-material laminates without sacrificing high-speed filling line efficiency.

SKYMONO BVE is engineered to be clear, strong, and resistant to damage, making it the perfect choice for premium-shelf packaging. Its superior puncture and tear resistance, combined with its reduced CO2e compared to similar PE alternatives, make it an environmentally friendly choice. Plus, its superior low seal temperature allows for optimal speeds and a wide operating window, making it ideal for a range of applications, including dry foods, frozen foods, pet treats, and cheese/meat products.

The launch of SKYMONO BVE is a clear demonstration of our commitment to sustainability and our customer’s sustainability goals. This new product provides an ideal alternative to conventional multi-material laminates without affecting high-speed filling line efficiencies

Dan Richards – Sales & Marketing Director

Key Features:

  • Exceptional gas and aroma barrier
  • Best performance for high quality printing
  • Good mechanical stability
  • High transparency
  • Engineered for high speed FFS applications
  • Improved barrier to Mineral Oils compared to non-barrier films

We believe in the power of this product to make a real difference for our customers and the environment. That’s why we’re excited to offer SKYMONO BVE in film on a reel, and a choice between matte or gloss registration. And for those looking for a PP alternative to PE, we also offer a range of SKYMONO BVP and other recyclable film and paper-based flexible packaging solutions.

SKYMONO BVE has been designed with the latest technology in material science. It provides high-performance packaging solutions while maintaining a focus on sustainability. This product will make a real difference to our customers and the environment.

Paul Glover – Commercial Technical Director

Join us at the Packaging Innovations expo in Birmingham, England from February 15-16 to see samples of SKYMONO BVE and learn more about how we can help you achieve your sustainable packaging goals. Get in touch with us today to schedule a meeting or to learn more about our forward-thinking packaging solutions.

The European Union (EU) is taking steps to meet its objectives under the European Green Deal by proposing revisions to the packaging and packaging waste directive and provisionally agreeing to introduce a carbon border tax. These changes will have a significant impact on the packaging and manufacturing industries.

The proposed revisions to the packaging and packaging waste directive (PPWD) aim to make all packaging in the EU recyclable by 2030, reduce the generation of packaging waste, and increase the use of recycled plastics in packaging. The measures include targets for waste reduction and reuse, restrictions on over-packaging, design criteria for packaging, deposit return systems, and minimum inclusion rates for recycled content in plastic packaging. This is a major step forward for the EU in its efforts to reduce waste and improve recycling rates, but it will also pose a significant challenge for packaging manufacturers.

According to the European Commission, the PPWD revisions will also help to prevent confusion around compostable plastics and support reuse and refill systems, promoting circular economy and reduced environmental impact. Spain has already approved the transposition of the proposal into domestic legislation, and examples include a ban on grocery stores selling fruit and vegetables in plastic packaging if they weigh less than 1.5 kg.

Plastic packaging manufacturers will be most impacted by the proposed PPWD revisions and will need to adapt to the new requirements in order to maintain market share. Companies that are able to adapt quickly to these new requirements will likely gain market share and may be able to embed themselves into a new high-quality “closed loop” packaging cycle for plastics.

The EU has also provisionally agreed to introduce a carbon border tax (CBAM) on goods imported from higher-polluting regions. The CBAM aims to prevent “carbon leakage” and create a level playing field for EU member states by raising import prices. According to the European Commission, it will initially cover 60% of industrial emissions and include sectors such as iron and steel, cement, and electricity and hydrogen. The scope may be expanded to other sectors after 2025.

The proposed revisions to the packaging and packaging waste directive, and the introduction of a carbon border tax, are aimed at achieving a more sustainable future for the EU. These changes will have a significant impact on the packaging and manufacturing industries, with plastic packaging manufacturers being the most affected. Companies that are able to adapt quickly to these new requirements will likely gain market share and may be able to embed themselves into a new high-quality “closed loop” packaging cycle for plastics.

References:

Sustainable packaging refers to packaging that is designed, produced, and disposed of in a way that reduces its environmental impact. There are several challenges that companies face when it comes to implementing sustainable packaging solutions. Here are five of the main challenges and some strategies for overcoming them:

Cost:

One of the main challenges of sustainable packaging is that it can often be more expensive than traditional packaging options. One way to overcome this challenge is to consider the total cost of ownership, rather than just the upfront costs. This includes factors such as the cost of disposal and the potential cost savings from reduced waste and reduced energy and resource consumption. Life cycle analysis (LCA) is a tool used to assess the environmental impacts of a product or system throughout its entire lifecycle, from raw material extraction to disposal. LCA can be used to evaluate the sustainability of flexible packaging, as it allows for the identification and quantification of potential environmental impacts and the identification of opportunities for improvement.

We’re dedicated to offering a personalised, collaborative experience, listening to our customers, and understanding their demands and requirements to bring forward thinking, innovation packaging solutions

Dan Richards – Sales & Marketing Director

Some benefits of conducting an LCA of flexible packaging include:

  • Identifying environmental hotspots: LCA can help identify the stages of the lifecycle that have the greatest environmental impact, which can inform decisions about where to focus efforts to reduce these impacts.
  • Comparing alternatives: LCA can be used to compare the environmental impacts of different flexible packaging materials or design options, allowing companies to choose the most sustainable option.
  • Improving efficiency: By identifying areas of the lifecycle that have high environmental impacts, companies can implement measures to reduce these impacts and increase the efficiency of their packaging processes.
  • Meeting regulatory requirements: Many governments and organizations have established environmental regulations and standards for packaging, and LCA can help companies meet these requirements.
  • Demonstrating sustainability: Companies that use LCA to evaluate and improve the sustainability of their packaging can use this information to communicate their commitment to sustainability to customers and stakeholders.

Overall, LCA can provide valuable information about the environmental impacts of flexible packaging and help companies make informed decisions about how to design and use packaging in a more sustainable way.

Consumer demand:

Some consumers may not be familiar with sustainable packaging options or may not be willing to pay a premium for them. One way to overcome this challenge is to educate consumers about the benefits of sustainable packaging and to make it more widely available.

Here are three benefits of sustainable packaging and strategies for making it more widely available:

  • Reduced environmental impact: One of the main benefits of sustainable packaging is that it can reduce the environmental impact of packaging throughout its lifecycle. This includes reducing the use of natural resources, such as water and raw materials, and reducing waste and pollution.
  • Cost savings: Implementing sustainable packaging can also result in cost savings for companies. For example, using lightweight packaging materials can reduce transportation costs, and designing packaging for reuse or recycling can reduce disposal costs.
  • Improved brand reputation: Consumers are increasingly aware of the environmental impacts of packaging and are looking for products that are packaged in a sustainable way. By using sustainable packaging, companies can demonstrate their commitment to sustainability and improve their brand reputation.

Compatibility with product:

Sustainable packaging options may not always be suitable for certain products, especially those that require special protection or have specific storage requirements. In these cases, it may be necessary to find alternative packaging materials or to design packaging that meets the needs of the product while still being sustainable. However with the help of SKYGREEN we’re able to walk through the necessary steps to ensure that we work in collaboration to innovate and bring the right solution to meet the demands of your products.

Supply chain and logistics:

Implementing sustainable packaging can also require changes to the supply chain and logistics systems, which can be challenging to coordinate and implement. One way to overcome this challenge is to work with suppliers and logistics providers to develop and implement sustainable packaging solutions.

There are several benefits of working with a UK supplier when sourcing sustainable plastic packaging, including:

  • Reduced transportation costs: Working with a UK supplier can reduce transportation costs, as the products do not have to be shipped from overseas. This can help to reduce the environmental impacts of transportation and make the packaging more sustainable.
  • Improved communication and responsiveness: Working with a UK supplier can also facilitate better communication and responsiveness, as it is easier to meet in person or speak on the phone, and there are fewer time zone differences to contend with. This can be particularly important when working on complex or custom packaging projects.
  • Support for local economy: Working with a UK supplier can also support the local economy, as it helps to create and maintain jobs and business opportunities within the country. This can be a key consideration for companies that are committed to sustainability and social responsibility.

Regulation:

Sustainable packaging is often subject to various regulations and standards, which can be complex and vary by region. To overcome this challenge, companies should be familiar with the relevant regulations and standards and work with experts to ensure compliance. In particular the upcoming EPR scheme.

epr-diagram

Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is a policy approach that holds producers responsible for the environmental impacts of their products throughout their lifecycle, including the end-of-life phase. Here are three things to consider when implementing EPR:

  • The scope of the EPR program: It is important to clearly define the scope of the EPR program, including which products and materials are covered and what responsibilities producers have. This may include requirements for the design of products and packaging to facilitate recycling or reuse, as well as financial or logistical responsibilities for managing end-of-life products.
  • The cost of the EPR program: Implementing EPR can involve significant costs for producers, including the costs of complying with regulations, collecting and recycling end-of-life products, and any fees or penalties for non-compliance. It is important to consider the potential costs and benefits of EPR and to design a program that is financially sustainable for producers.
  • The impact on consumers: EPR programs can also have an impact on consumers, as they may result in changes to the prices or availability of products. It is important to consider the potential impact on consumers and to communicate any changes clearly to avoid any negative consequences.

Overall, the key to overcoming these challenges is to approach sustainable packaging as a long-term investment and to take a holistic view of the entire packaging lifecycle. This includes considering the environmental and social impacts of packaging materials, design, production, use, and disposal, as well as the economic costs and benefits.

Questions to ask about recyclable packaging in the UK

If you are looking for information about recyclable packaging in the UK, here are a few key questions you may want to ask:

What types of packaging materials are currently considered recyclable in the UK?

In the UK, certain types of plastic packaging materials are considered recyclable and can be collected and processed through the recycling system. These include polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE), which are commonly used for bottles and containers. Other types of plastics that are considered recyclable in the UK include low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS).

However, not all types of plastic packaging are considered recyclable in the UK. Some types, such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyethylene film, are not easily recyclable and may not be accepted by most recycling facilities. Additionally, some types of plastic packaging, such as black plastic and biodegradable plastics, may not be easily detectable by the recycling equipment and may be contaminated in the recycling process.

Overall, it’s important to check with your local recycling facility to determine which types of plastic packaging are considered recyclable in your area. This can help you make more sustainable choices for your packaging needs.

What are the requirements for packaging to be considered recyclable in the UK?

In the UK, packaging materials are considered recyclable if they can be collected, processed, and used to make new products through the recycling system. To be considered recyclable, packaging materials must be made from materials that can be easily separated and processed by recycling facilities, and must be free from contaminants such as food waste or other non-recyclable materials.

Additionally, packaging materials must be clearly labeled with recycling information, such as the type of material they are made from and any relevant recycling symbols. This helps to ensure that the materials are properly sorted and processed by recycling facilities.

Overall, the requirements for packaging to be considered recyclable in the UK are designed to ensure that the materials can be easily collected, processed, and used to make new products through the recycling system. By meeting these requirements, packaging materials can help to reduce waste and improve the sustainability of the UK’s economy.

How does the UK recycling system work, and how can I ensure that my packaging is recycled properly?

The UK recycling system is a network of facilities and services that are responsible for collecting, sorting, and processing recyclable materials. The system is funded by a combination of government grants and private sector investment, and is operated by local authorities, waste management companies, and other organizations.

To ensure that your packaging is recycled properly, it’s important to follow the guidelines and requirements of your local recycling facility. This may include properly sorting your recyclable materials, cleaning and preparing them for recycling, and properly labeling them with recycling information.

Additionally, you should check with your local recycling facility to determine which types of packaging materials they accept, as not all materials are considered recyclable in all areas. This will help you make more sustainable choices for your packaging needs and ensure that your materials are properly recycled.

Overall, by following the guidelines and requirements of your local recycling facility, you can help to ensure that your packaging is recycled properly and contribute to the sustainability of the UK’s economy.

Are there any regulations or standards governing the use of recyclable packaging in the UK?

Yes, there are several regulations and standards governing the use of recyclable packaging in the UK. These include the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulations, which require producers and manufacturers to take responsibility for the environmental impacts of their packaging and to use sustainable materials wherever possible.

Additionally, there are several voluntary standards and certifications that companies can use to demonstrate their commitment to sustainability and recyclability. These include the British Retail Consortium (BRC) Global Standard for Packaging and Packaging Materials, which sets out requirements for the sustainability, performance, and safety of packaging materials, and the European Recycling Label, which provides a standard way to communicate the recyclability of packaging to consumers.

Overall, these regulations and standards provide guidance and incentives for companies to use more sustainable and recyclable packaging materials in the UK, helping to reduce waste and improve the sustainability of the economy.

How can I make my packaging more sustainable and improve its recyclability?

There are several steps you can take to make your packaging more sustainable and improve its recyclability. These include:

  1. Choose the right materials: Select packaging materials that are considered recyclable in your area, and avoid using materials that are difficult or impossible to recycle.
  2. Use recycled content: Consider using packaging materials that are made from recycled content, as this can help to reduce the overall environmental impact of your packaging.
  3. Design for recyclability: Make sure that your packaging is designed to be easily recyclable, with clear labeling and no contaminants such as food waste or other non-recyclable materials.
  4. Use eco-friendly packaging: Consider using packaging materials that are made from sustainable, natural, or biodegradable materials, such as paper, cardboard, or plant-based plastics.
  5. Reduce packaging waste: Try to reduce the overall amount of packaging you use, and consider using packaging that can be easily reused or repurposed.

By following these steps, you can make your packaging more sustainable and improve its recyclability, helping to reduce waste and improve the environmental performance of your business.

Are there any support programs or incentives available for companies that use recyclable packaging in the UK?

Yes, there are several support programs and incentives available for companies that use recyclable packaging in the UK. These include government grants, funding programs, and certification schemes that recognize and reward companies for their efforts to reduce waste and improve the sustainability of their packaging.

One example is the UK government’s Resource and Waste Strategy, which includes a number of initiatives and programs to support the use of sustainable and recyclable packaging. These include the Packaging Recycling Fund, which provides grants to support the development of more sustainable packaging, and the Courtauld Commitment, which is a voluntary agreement that encourages companies to reduce the environmental impact of their packaging.

Additionally, there are several certification schemes that recognize and reward companies for their efforts to use sustainable and recyclable packaging. These include the BRC Global Standard for Packaging and Packaging Materials, which provides a certification for companies that meet specific requirements for sustainability and performance, and the European Recycling Label, which is a standardized way to communicate the recyclability of packaging to consumers.

Overall, these support programs and incentives can help companies to use more sustainable and recyclable packaging in the UK, and can provide recognition and rewards for their efforts to reduce waste and improve the sustainability of their operations.

How can I find out more about the latest developments and trends in recyclable packaging in the UK?

There are several ways you can find out more about the latest developments and trends in recyclable packaging in the UK. These include:

  1. Research online: You can search for articles, reports, and information about recyclable packaging on the internet. This can provide a wealth of information and insights about the latest developments and trends in the industry.
  2. Attend industry events and conferences: There are many industry events and conferences focused on packaging and sustainability, where you can learn about the latest developments and trends in recyclable packaging.
  3. Join industry organizations and networks: There are many industry organizations and networks that provide information, resources, and networking opportunities for companies involved in packaging and sustainability. Joining these organizations can help you stay up to date with the latest developments and trends in the industry.
  4. Consult with experts: You can also consult with experts and professionals in the field of packaging and sustainability to get their insights and advice on the latest developments and trends in recyclable packaging. This can help you make more informed decisions about your packaging choices.

Overall, by researching online, attending industry events, joining organizations and networks, and consulting with experts, you can stay up to date with the latest developments and trends in recyclable packaging in the UK.

By asking these questions, you can gain a better understanding of the current state of recyclable packaging in the UK and learn how to make more sustainable choices for your packaging needs.

How will the extended producer responsibility benefit the UK

Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is a policy approach that requires manufacturers and producers to take greater responsibility for the environmental impacts of their products throughout their life cycle. This can include responsibilities such as the collection and disposal of products at the end of their useful life, as well as the use of more sustainable materials in the production of those products.

In the UK, the implementation of EPR has the potential to provide several benefits. These include:

  • Reducing waste and pollution: By requiring manufacturers to take responsibility for the disposal of their products, EPR can help to reduce the amount of waste that is generated and prevent pollution from discarded products.
  • Encouraging the use of more sustainable materials: By making manufacturers responsible for the environmental impacts of their products, EPR can provide incentives for them to use more sustainable materials in the production process. This can help to reduce the overall environmental footprint of products.
  • Improving resource efficiency: EPR can help to ensure that products are designed for reuse, repair, and recycling, which can help to extend the useful life of products and improve the overall efficiency of the economy.
  • Creating new jobs and economic opportunities: The implementation of EPR can create new jobs in the waste management and recycling industries, as well as new opportunities for companies that provide eco-friendly products and services.

As a business, you should consider several factors in preparation for EPR.

  • First, you should assess the environmental impacts of your products and identify any potential challenges or liabilities that may arise from implementing EPR. This could include the cost of collecting, transporting, and recycling your products, as well as any potential negative impacts on your supply chain or operations.
  • Second, you should consider how EPR may affect your business strategy and operations. This could include changes to your product design, manufacturing processes, distribution channels, or marketing efforts. You should also consider how EPR may impact your relationships with customers, suppliers, regulators, and other stakeholders.
  • Third, you should develop a plan for implementing EPR in your business. This could include setting targets and goals, identifying responsible parties and roles, developing systems and processes for collection, transportation, and recycling, and providing training and support to your employees.

Overall, it is important for businesses to carefully consider the potential impacts of EPR and develop a plan for implementing it in a way that minimizes any negative effects and maximizes the benefits for the environment and your business.

The use of plastic packaging is highly demonised within the press and, although there is more to be done in reducing the use of unnecessary plastic packaging, is there still a place for it today? Food waste is not only an environmental but a humanitarian crisis. Around 1/3 of food produced globally is wasted yet more than 800 million people are considered to be starving. Although plastics remains a serious issue contributor to the global environmental crisis, food waste actually contributes more to climate change than plastics.

1.3 billion tons of food is wasted every year around the world”

Plastic Euroe

According to Plastics Europe, “around 1.3 billion tons of food is wasted every year around the world”. Despite some issues, plastics can provide an ideal solution to this ever-increasing issue. By keeping perishable foodstuffs, such as fruits and vegetables, in plastic packaging, it can be delivered with the highest quality guaranteed and maximum shelf-life possible. This helps to reduce both global food wastage and energy consumption whilst vicariously increasing sustainability. Plastics Europe also goes one step further, announcing “the first commercial manufacturing plant that captures C02 emissions…is now operational”. The ability to become carbon-neutral within the packaging industry is a gamechanger for sustainability. Plastic retains its value beyond the end of its current lifecycle as it has the capacity to be recreated time and time again. This recovery of energy saves on fossil fuels and further prevents mass wastage. New technology with the ability to breakdown “non-recyclable” polymers becoming more accessible, virgin polymer production (which requires oil or gas for energy) can begin to retire and therefore become more sustainable: recycling the unrecyclable.

Food waste feeds climate change. Up to 40% of all food produced ends up wasted. This equates to around 8–10% of all greenhouse gas emissions. According to WRAP, “in the UK, 70% of post-farm gate food waste comes from the home”. Plastic packaging increases the shelf-life of perishable products. By extending this edible period, food is much less likely to be wasted. For example, the shelf-life of beef can be extended by 5-10 days with the use of advanced plastic packaging, remaining fresher for longer so food wastage is decreased. Europe on average loses around 3% of all food produced compared to up to 40% in developing countries. If plastic packaging can be more widely accessible to a global population, food wastage can be significantly decreased, and suppliers can maintain quality and freshness. This decreases waste at every part of the chain, from picking to packing to eating. WRAP has released recommendations to improve this food wastage as well as try and save on excess plastic packaging. These recommendations include selling loose, removing date labels and provide ‘Best Practice’ guidance on storage.  If industry was to implement WRAP’s three recommendations, they estimate around 14,000,000 shopping baskets worth of food waste could be avoided along with around 1,110 truckloads of plastic.

In a post-pandemic world, many of us are still deeply uncomfortable with loose produce. Plastic packaging protects against contamination of food by creating a barrier between us and the produce. This not only extends shelf life but saves on water wastage as washing is not required. Plastic containers for more delicate products such as berries provide not only a sanitary purpose but also prevents physical damage in transport. This in turn reduces waste as more produce makes it to our supermarkets rather than be disposed of before they even hit the shelves.

Just 1kg of food going to landfill produces the same emissions as 25,000 plastic bottles (500ml)

When it comes to an overuse single use plastics, it can be agreed that it has a negative impact on the environment and steps have been taken to reduce this. Food waste, however, is the hidden climate crisis that seldom hits the headlines like plastic waste. Just 1kg of food going to landfill produces the same emissions as 25,000 plastic bottles (500ml). We still have more to do in reducing our environmental impact and plastics can surprisingly aid that. By using plastics to elongate the shelf-life of perishable goods we can reduce global food wastage and the greenhouse gas emissions they produce. This greatly reduces the negative impact we upon the environment and helps to prevent further climate change.

It doesn’t take long whilst scrolling through LinkedIn or browsing packaging media outlet news feed that you’ll come across a post or an opinion that would suggest that one form of packaging is “better” than the other. Especially when it comes to the debate of paper “vs” plastic and recyclability “vs” carbon emissions.

The comments section is filled with “no it isn’t”, and “”but you’re only consider one thing”, or “there is no one single solution” and I agree with them all.

We must always go back to why we have packaging, it is to PROTECT & PRESERVE

  • To protect: There wouldn’t be any hunger in the world if there were no food losses. More food is produced than we really eat or utilise. While packaging is powerless to stop waste, it is able to stop spoiling. Although shelf life is constrained, it can be extended. The shelf life of unpackaged beef is four days. Meat that has been vacuum-packed has a shelf life of around 30 days. Increased product shelf life helps prevent food waste and postpone deterioration.
  • For growth: The flow of commodities increases as a result of urbanisation, expansion, and globalisation, posing new infrastructural issues. Significantly less transport capacity are required throughout the life cycle as a result of the low weight and space savings. Less traffic, less strain on the infrastructure, and less environmental pollution are all benefits of having more merchandise on the trucks. It is feasible to save weight and space during shipment by using thinner films. As a result, the amount of cargo during transportation rises dramatically, and loading zones may be utilised to their full potential. Thus, the life cycle evaluation is enhanced (LCA). Flexible packaging is efficient and economical. Products are more reasonably priced for those with modest incomes when they are packaged in small, economical amounts.

In a technical sense, it is possible to recycle all plastic, and the technology is available. However, in order to sift, recycle, and sell them as raw materials for new products, they must first be gathered. All of this must be accomplished economically. The development of new recycling methods that enable the industrial-scale recycling of even more forms of plastic may take a few years. However, in the interim, the plastics sector is collaborating with the government to achieve the shared objective of streamlining the materials that are gathered for recycling across the UK to make life simpler for individuals.

What we see in the interim is a race for alternatives to plastic as it is somewhat seen as the enemy! Yet time and time again publication and research back the opinion that alternative have a negative impact vs plastics.

The plastics investigated in a recent research by KcKinsey & Company offer lower overall GHG contribution compared with alternatives in 13 of 14 applications for which nonplastic alternatives are deployed at scale. Taking into account both the impact of consumption and the product life cycle, GHG reductions range from 10 to 90%. Additionally, there aren’t many alternatives to plastics today in many applications, particularly those that are centred in food packaging. Given their smaller GHG footprint, plastics use in the near term can actually aid decarbonization efforts in these sectors, notably in terms of food spoilage and energy efficiency.

It all depends on the application

The degree to which sustainability factors are given priority affects the sustainability of packaging materials. Businesses in the value chain will need to be aware of the trade-offs between reducing waste and carbon footprint.

So what is the criteria that should be considered:

  1. Minise the harm that non recyclable packaging will have on the environment
  2. Assess the GHG emission
  3. Recyclability and recycled content

Recycling is effective. Recently the British Plastic Federation concluded in response to the Big Plastic Count that between 30 and 80 percent of the carbon emissions produced during the manufacture and processing of virgin plastic are avoided through recycling. The quantity of plastic recycled has grown 2.4 times since 2006, with the UK recycling 51 percent of plastic packaging in 2020. For the first time ever, the UK recycled more plastic within its borders than it did for recycling abroad last year. Although there is still work to be done, it is apparent that progress has been made.

At Skymark we want to enable & inspire every individual and organisation to do more, using less. With our passion & desire to listen and give a personalised, collaborative experience, developing Innovative, forward thinking packaging solutions

Dan Richards – Sales & Marketing Director